23Views 0Comments
There are two kinds of people asking AI to make a worksheet.
The first types a sentence, gets something close, asks for a change, gets something worse, and is still going forty minutes later.
The second gets a usable page on the first or second try, almost every time.
The difference is not the tool, the subscription or some secret phrase. It is that the second person describes the page like an architect and the first describes it like a customer.
The request that wastes your evening
Make me a fun counting worksheet for kindergarten kids with cute animals.
Every word there is about feeling. Fun. Cute. Kindergarten. Nothing in it says how many questions, where they sit, how big anything is, or what a child is meant to do.
So the tool invents all of it. Then you spend the evening correcting choices you never made.
Describe the skeleton before the skin
Before you write a single word about style, answer five questions about structure.
- What size is the paper? A4 or US Letter. Portrait or landscape.
- How many separate things are on the page? Six boxes. Ten lines. One big picture and a caption.
- How are they arranged? Two columns of three. A single list down the page. A grid.
- What goes in each one? Say it for each position, not in general.
- What does the person do with it? Write, circle, colour, cut, match.
Those five answers are the page. Everything else is decoration.
The same worksheet, described properly
A counting worksheet on A4 portrait paper.
At the top, a title line and two short blank lines labelled Name and Date.
Below that, six boxes arranged in two columns of three rows. Equal size, equal spacing, clear thin borders.
Each box contains a small group of identical animals, between one and six of them, and an empty circle in the bottom right corner of the box where a child writes the number.
Box one: two rabbits. Box two: five ducks. Box three: one elephant. Box four: four fish. Box five: six bees. Box six: three cats.
Leave a generous white margin all the way around. Simple black line drawings, no shading, no colour, nothing behind the boxes.
Longer to write. Far shorter to finish.
Count out loud, every time
Notice that the example above names the contents of all six boxes instead of saying “different animals in each box”.
Vague quantities are where these pages fall apart. Ask for “a few” and you get anywhere between two and nine. Ask for “several exercises” and you get a different number every time you try.
Name the number. Then name what goes in each position. It feels tedious for about thirty seconds and then it saves you the whole evening.
Say what you do not want
A printable page has requirements that a pretty picture does not, and the tool has no way of knowing them unless you say so.
Useful things to rule out by name:
- No background colour, because it drains a printer cartridge and looks grey on home printers
- No shading or gradients, for the same reason
- Nothing within two centimetres of the edge, because home printers cannot print there
- No decorative flourishes inside the answer spaces
- No text at all, if you plan to add the words yourself afterwards
That last one is worth its own habit. Text inside generated images goes wrong often enough that for anything you intend to sell, it is safer to leave the words out and add them in Canva. I wrote about why in the post about AI spelling words wrong on covers.
Describe positions, not vibes
When something comes back wrong, the instinct is to say “make it better” or “that is not quite right”.
Neither of those contains information. Point at a place and say what should be there instead.
Weak: “the boxes look wrong”
Strong: “the second box in the left column is wider than the others, make all six exactly the same width”
Weak: “too cluttered”
Strong: “double the space between the rows and remove the small stars in the corners”
One change at a time. Ask for five fixes at once and you will get three of them and a new problem.
Build the description once, reuse it forever
This is the part that turns a nice trick into a business.
Once a description produces a page you are happy with, save it in a plain text file. Then mark the bits that change from page to page.
Box one: [TWO RABBITS]. Box two: [FIVE DUCKS]. Box three: [ONE ELEPHANT].
Now making page two of your book is swapping six short phrases rather than describing a layout from nothing. Thirty pages stop being thirty design problems and become one design problem plus thirty lists.
This is also what makes a book look like a book. Pages built from one description share their margins, spacing and line weight. Pages described fresh each time never quite match, and buyers feel it even when they cannot name it.
Sketch it if words are failing you
Some layouts are genuinely hard to put into sentences. A maze with a border and a key in one corner. A cut-and-paste page where pieces live at the bottom.
For those, draw six rough rectangles on paper, photograph it, and attach it as a reference. Ten seconds of terrible drawing communicates a layout better than a paragraph of careful description.
The habit in one line
Before you type anything, say the page out loud as though you were describing it to someone drawing it over the phone who cannot see your screen.
That person needs sizes, counts and positions. Give them those, and the page arrives finished.
